BEGINNER · 12 MIN · FREE LESSON
Rate limiter design
Explore rate limiter design through a visual, step-by-step model.
Loading interactive lesson…
BEGINNER · 12 MIN · FREE LESSON
Explore rate limiter design through a visual, step-by-step model.
Loading interactive lesson…
POST /admission/checkAdmit or reject a client request with a weighted cost.
PUT /policies/{id}Update an authenticated policy version.
Break the design: Send a burst on both sides of a window boundary, compare fixed windows and exact logs, then change request cost and refill rate.
These API paths describe the exercise system; they are not AlgoVerse endpoints.
Events have millisecond timestamps, client keys and integer costs. Compare token bucket, fixed window, exact sliding log and approximate sliding counter. limit is the burst/window quota; token bucket refill is separate.
Loading architecture diagram…
Introduce Client keys: Place the limiter before expensive application work.
Fixed windows permit boundary bursts. Token buckets cap accumulated burst credit and refill with elapsed time. Sliding logs enforce an exact weighted window; sliding counters estimate the previous window’s surviving share and can differ from exact admission. A distributed deployment additionally needs atomic shared-state updates and a trustworthy time model.
Requests evaluated, seed 42. Plotted sample sizes respect each lesson’s explicit input limits.
Keyboard: Space play/pause · ←/→ step · R restart · 1–5 speed. Reduced motion disables transitions.
Apply per-client weighted request budgets. A useful design makes ownership, trade-offs and failure outcomes explicit.
Build the architecture one component at a time. Read the requirements and estimates above the player, then inspect the modeled state transitions.
Place the limiter before expensive application work.
Partition state by authenticated client and policy.
Token buckets allow bounded bursts while exact logs enforce a rolling window.
Treat admission and budget debit as one atomic operation.
Define fail-open or fail-closed behavior separately for each endpoint.
The interactive overview includes editable daily actors, request frequency, peak factor, payload and retention assumptions. RPS is daily requests divided by 86,400. Storage estimates exclude replication, metadata and indexes. These are planning assumptions, not measured provider capacity.
The overview lists example service API contracts and durable entity keys. These paths describe the hypothetical service; they are not callable AlgoVerse endpoints. Define authentication, pagination and error semantics before implementing a real service.
Predict an input-dependent state transition before advancing. Change one assumption at a time and account for committed, rejected, stale or pending outcomes.
Send a burst on both sides of a window boundary, compare fixed windows and exact logs, then change request cost and refill rate.
Use the displayed operation counters and complexity assumptions. Capacity estimates, simulator running time and real end-to-end latency are different measurements.
The four language references implement the stated core mechanism. They are bounded teaching implementations, not complete deployable service backends. The visualizer adds architecture, validated controls and outcome narration around that mechanism.
Use the exercise to explain requirements, ownership, scaling pressure and failure policy in a design interview. Validate a production design with actual workload measurements and the complete selected provider protocol.
Do not turn an illustrative throughput parameter into a universal benchmark. Distinguish retry safety from exactly-once external effects, a cache from durable ownership, and a timeout from a known failure. Name the model limits before claiming a guarantee.
Explain one state transition, one failure invariant and one concern outside the bounded simulation.
MAKE IT STICK
Progress saves on this device and merges with your account after sign-in.
0 / 5000 · Saved on this device; synced when signed in.